The Electrified Apex Predators: Dissecting the BMW M5 Touring and Mercedes-AMG C63s E-Performance
As an automotive engineer and industry observer with a decade entrenched in high-performance vehicle development, I’ve witnessed the landscape shift dramatically. Electrification, once a niche concept, is now central to the future of every segment, including the most revered performance plug-in hybrid vehicles. The conversation around what truly defines a superlative driving machine has evolved, demanding a nuanced understanding of power delivery, weight management, and the intangible connection between driver and road. This evolution is perhaps nowhere more keenly felt than in the current crop of performance PHEVs, where carmakers grapple with integrating substantial battery capacity and electric motors into their most potent offerings.
The recent opportunity to spend significant time with both the all-new G99 BMW M5 Touring and the Mercedes-AMG C63s E-Performance presented a fascinating, almost revelatory, comparison. These two titans, each representing their brand’s distinct philosophy, approach the challenge of electrifying raw power from fundamentally different angles. My experience behind the wheel of these sophisticated machines left me with a surprising conclusion, one that underscores a critical truth about modern hybrid performance vehicles: sometimes, less battery, paradoxically, means more performance.
The BMW M5 Touring: A Behemoth of Electrified Might
Let’s first delve into the formidable 2025 BMW M5 Touring. From the outset, its sheer presence is undeniable. This is a grand touring wagon designed to devour continents with ruthless efficiency and staggering speed. Beneath its muscular sheet metal lies a complex powertrain: a monstrous 4.4-liter twin-turbocharged V-8 engine working in concert with a potent electric motor, all channeled through an eight-speed automatic gearbox. BMW’s stated combined output of 717 horsepower and 737 pound-feet of torque hints at its capabilities, but real-world dyno tests suggest figures closer to 800 horsepower at the crank, feeding close to 700 hp to the wheels. This is a beast that pins you to your seat with alarming, almost disorienting, ferocity, regardless of whether you’re launching from a standstill or executing a rolling overtake.
The M5 Touring’s powertrain architecture is, in many respects, a marvel of modern automotive engineering. The electric motor, independently capable of generating 197 hp and 206 lb-ft of torque, can propel this substantial machine on its own. And substantial it is. At an estimated 5,456 pounds (2,475 kg), the M5 Touring redefines “heavyweight.” Surprisingly, it’s in its pure EV mode that the M5 occasionally finds an unexpected charm. Gliding silently through urban environments, with a subtle, synthesized acceleration sound piped into the cabin, the M5 feels genuinely brisk. The feeling of the eight-speed gearbox shifting even without the V-8 firing adds an intriguing layer to the electric driving experience. Power is delivered to all four wheels, ensuring steadfast traction, a boon for those navigating diverse weather conditions. This around-town electric capability is truly impressive, offering a serene, quiet luxury that belies the monster lurking beneath the hood.
However, the immense curb weight of the M5 Touring becomes its Achilles’ heel when the driving experience shifts from serene cruising to spirited engagement. BMW engineers have undeniably performed miracles with the chassis tuning, but physics, even for the best, remains an unyielding mistress. The suspension, tasked with managing this colossal mass, often struggles to strike a consistent balance. One moment, the ride can feel surprisingly supple, almost Maybach-like; the next, it morphs into an unsettling pogo stick, particularly over mid-corner undulations. This inconsistency in ride quality is deeply unsettling in a performance plug-in hybrid of this caliber, often leading to alarming chassis disturbances that disrupt the car’s composure.
Driving the M5 Touring dynamically, the sheer inertia is palpable. It feels like an athlete running with ankle weights – immensely powerful, yet noticeably encumbered. The transfer of forces from one side to the other through a series of bends is pronounced, and there’s a constant battle against understeer when pushing the limits. For a vehicle synonymous with ultimate driving prowess, this heavy, slightly disconnected sensation was a genuine surprise, leading me to a thought I never expected: a fleeting wish for the pure electric i5 Touring M60, which, despite its own weight, feels more predictably composed due to a different weight distribution and lower center of gravity. The new M5, for all its prodigious power, didn’t instantly ignite the visceral desire I’ve come to associate with M Division vehicles.
The Mercedes-AMG C63s E-Performance: A Surgical Approach to Hybrid Power
Transitioning from the M5 Touring to the Mercedes-AMG C63s E-Performance was an immediate lesson in perspective. While still undeniably a heavy car by traditional sports sedan standards, the C63 PHEV immediately felt significantly more agile and connected. I understand that it occupies a different size class from the M5, making it not a direct apples-to-apples comparison in terms of market segment. However, the contrast in driving philosophy and execution of their respective performance plug-in hybrid systems is stark, and in many ways, the C63 presents a more compelling driver’s package.
At the heart of the C63s E-Performance lies a compact but ferocious 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine, a marvel of engineering borrowed from AMG’s hottest compact offerings like the CLA 45. This isn’t just any four-cylinder; it’s a hand-assembled AMG engine, proudly bearing the signature of its builder – a testament to its bespoke nature, clearly visible under the hood alongside the sophisticated big turbo and electric supercharger setup. This attention to detail immediately felt more special than the M5’s rather understated engine bay. On its own, this M139 engine delivers well over 400 horsepower. But it’s the symbiotic relationship with the electric motor that truly transforms the C63, culminating in a staggering combined output of 670 hp and an even more impressive 752 lb-ft (1,020 Nm) of torque.
Crucially, the C63 achieves this with a significant weight advantage, tipping the scales approximately 880 pounds (400 kg) lighter than the M5 Touring. This translates directly into a more responsive and exhilarating driving experience. The force experienced during a “Race Start” in the C63 is truly unlike anything I’ve felt in a combustion-engined car, launching with an instantaneous, violent shove that feels faster than its on-paper figures might suggest. The all-wheel drive system is incredibly effective at translating this immense torque into relentless forward motion.
The electric supercharger plays a pivotal role in this responsiveness, virtually eliminating turbo lag. The combined surge of electric and internal combustion torque is genuinely breathtaking. While some critics have bemoaned the sound of the four-cylinder, I found it surprisingly characterful, even with the piped-in enhancements disabled. The raw mechanical symphony of the exhaust combined with the distinct hiss and whoosh of the turbo building and releasing pressure added to the thrill, creating an engaging auditory experience that felt authentically mechanical.
Where the C63 truly shines, however, is through the corners. Unlike previous C63 generations, which were often characterized by a playful eagerness to shred their rear tires, this new iteration feels like a precise, track-focused instrument. It’s incredibly planted, allowing for aggressive corner entry and devastatingly efficient exits with minimal drama. The engineering focus here wasn’t on pure electric range but on enhancing dynamic performance.
Mercedes’ ingenious move was designing a lighter, performance-optimized hybrid system. While the M5 and other premium performance plug-in hybrid vehicles often utilize a larger, more range-focused battery, the C63 features a compact 6.1 kWh battery. This is small by general PHEV standards, but it perfectly serves its primary purpose: performance enhancement and regulatory compliance (achieving favorable emissions ratings in lab tests for markets like the EU). The electric motor, integrated into the rear axle rather than the gearbox, is specifically tasked with boosting power, providing torque fill, and improving overall responsiveness, rather than providing extensive EV-only travel (though it can manage around 5 miles). This approach keeps the battery from overburdening the chassis, allowing the car’s inherent agility to shine through.
This lighter, performance-centric battery strategy has a tangible impact on real-world efficiency as well. While the M5 claims unrealistic WLTP figures due to its large battery, its EPA combined rating of 13 mpg (18 l/100 km) with a depleted battery is a more honest reflection of its V-8 thirst. The C63, with its smaller battery and four-cylinder engine, manages an EPA rating of 20 mpg with a depleted battery, which is remarkably good considering its ludicrous performance capabilities. Even when driven hard, my experience saw it returning around 15 mpg, a figure that’s commendable for a vehicle offering such mind-bending acceleration.
The Core Dilemma of Performance Electrification
The overarching takeaway from this intensive evaluation of these two prominent performance plug-in hybrid vehicles is clear: the pursuit of maximum electric range in a performance application can fundamentally compromise the driving experience. For an industry expert, this isn’t just about numbers; it’s about the soul of the machine. The target demographic for an M5 Touring or C63 AMG isn’t primarily concerned with maximizing electric miles or achieving peak advertised fuel efficiency. They are discerning enthusiasts seeking an unparalleled driving experience, a visceral connection, and uncompromising performance.
The heavy, large-capacity battery in the M5, while offering commendable EV range, ultimately distorts the car’s dynamic envelope. The additional mass necessitates significant compromises in chassis tuning, leading to a ride quality that can be jarring and handling that feels burdened. It’s a testament to BMW’s engineering prowess that the M5 is still incredibly capable, but it feels like it’s constantly battling against its own weight. This approach, while satisfying regulatory requirements and offering a ‘best of both worlds’ on paper, struggles to deliver the ‘best’ of either world in terms of pure driving exhilaration.
Mercedes-AMG, often criticized for their move to a four-cylinder engine in the C63, has, in my professional opinion, adopted the more astute strategy for a performance plug-in hybrid. By limiting battery size and strategically integrating the electric motor for pure performance enhancement, they’ve prioritized dynamic purity. The C63 is still heavier than a non-electrified V-8 counterpart would be, but its design choices mitigate the adverse effects of electrification on handling and agility to a far greater degree than its Bavarian rival. It offers a truly exhilarating, communicative, and special driving experience that transcends the cylinder count.
This aligns with what we see in other truly exceptional hybrid performance vehicles like the Ferrari 296 GTB, the second-generation Acura NSX, or the Corvette E-Ray. In these machines, the electrification’s primary role isn’t to provide dozens of miles of silent running (though a few miles are a welcome bonus), but to provide instantaneous torque fill, enhanced power, and sophisticated torque vectoring capabilities. Their battery capacities are typically under 8 kWh, deliberately chosen to avoid burdening the chassis and compromising the delicate balance of handling. This focused approach ensures the fundamental character of the high-performance car remains intact, enhanced, not diluted, by electricity.
Of course, a smaller battery means less pure EV range, and for some, the idea of the engine running as a “hamster wheel” to replenish a low pack might be a concern on extended track sessions. However, in real-world spirited driving, even for extended periods on twisty roads, the C63’s system proved robust. I drove it hard for over half an hour, and the battery charge remained healthy, continuously contributing to performance. This thermal management and energy recovery system is remarkably effective, ensuring sustained high output when needed.
The Future of Driving Pleasure
The journey of electrifying performance plug-in hybrid vehicles is complex, fraught with engineering challenges and philosophical debates. What the BMW M5 Touring and Mercedes-AMG C63s E-Performance demonstrate so vividly is that there’s more than one path to the electrified future, and not all paths lead to the same destination of driving pleasure. For those seeking the ultimate connection, the crispest turn-in, and the most engaging dynamic response, the clever integration of a smaller, performance-focused battery often proves superior to a larger, range-focused one. It highlights that true innovation in high-performance automotive design isn’t just about adding more power or more battery capacity; it’s about understanding the delicate balance of components and optimizing them for the intended, visceral outcome.
As the market for premium hybrid vehicles and luxury sports sedans continues to evolve, discerning buyers will increasingly scrutinize not just raw power figures, but how effectively that power translates into an authentic, exhilarating driving experience. This deep dive into the M5 Touring and C63s E-Performance illuminates the critical role of thoughtful engineering and strategic electrification in delivering truly segment-defining performance.
Curious to explore more in-depth analyses of cutting-edge automotive technology or compare other contenders in the performance plug-in hybrid arena? Dive deeper into our comprehensive reviews and expert insights, or engage with our community to share your own thoughts on the future of high-performance driving.
